Scary, scary monsters, now available!

Now available through Booklocker.com: Voracious by yours truly (distribution will be picked up within mere days by Amazon, Barnes&Noble and all your favorite book-hawkers; ebook version dropping within a week).

Patrick Worden delivers a unique story, horrifying monsters, characters with depth, and a dark prose style that will have you checking for monsters before the lights go out. Dripping with tension and loaded with chills, Voracious will both satisfy you and leave you hungering for more”                                        — Carl Hose, author of Blood Legacy

Be sure to check out TheyAreVoracious.com for teasers, excerpts and news. Drop back by often, as new content is added frequently.

And stay tuned for your chance to win an autographed copy (first edition) of Voracious plus more bonus swag!

Posted in New Post | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

RIP Adam “MCA” Yauch (Aug 5, 1964 – May 4 2012)

We’ve lost one of the founding members of the Beastie Boys; MCA is dead, reportedly of cancer, at the tragically young age of 47. He leaves behind a wife, a daughter and a musical legacy that bridges styles and cultures.

I was in high school when the Beastie Boys first gained fame. And although my pursuits and interests at the time weren’t all that different from theirs (i.e., I was engaged in a daily fight for my right to party), I didn’t much care for the Beasties. I didn’t much care for rap, and wasn’t much interested in what they were rapping about.

But then a funny thing happened: me and the Beasties grew up. We matured together. They became socially active right about the same time I did, championing causes that were (and are) important to me. My respect for them grew by bounds as they demonstrated courage and commitment for the sake of social change.

And then there was the music. It changed too; matured, broadened, got deeper. Got better. The Beastie Boys went from being, in my mind at least, a novelty (read: white) rap act, to an enormously talented trio of songwriters, musicians and performers. In 2012 they were inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Very much deservedly so, in my humble opinion.

Here, for what they’re worth, are our heartfelt condolences to Adam Yauch’s family, and to his lifelong best friends: Mike D. and Ad-Rock. Thanks for sharing him with us.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sensationalist and Fantastical Fiction!

Veering uncomfortably close to the realm of self-promotion, I present to you the Spring, 2012 edition of The Red Penny Papers. RPP is the place to go for amazing speculative fiction, presented for your convenience in HTML and e-book formats.

True, I’m a little invested. The cover story, “The Black Hole,” is mine. You’ll enjoy it if you like sepia-hued, steampunk-flavored adventure, wherein the finest minds of Victoria’s empire must fight to stop a magic spell from devouring the world. And all my thanks (and awe) to artist S.A. van Muijden for translating my scribbles into the breathtaking cover art seen above. 

But as I say to the mirror each morning, It’s Not All About Me. This issue, like every RPP, is chock full of damned good reading; you’ll do yourself a solid by reading it all. Also, read anything/everything you can get your hands on by the incomparable K.V. Taylor, RPP editor and chief manuscript massuese.

Thanks again to K.V., S.A. (omg!) and all RPP writers, wranglers and staff. And thank you, dear reader, for not only putting up with my gushing but also for clicking all those links so you can see exactly what I’m gushing about.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Digital (r)Evolution – a personal perspective

One thing about the craft of writing that has undeniably changed down through its history, is its actual methodology. It’s become way, way easier.

And it would be way way easy to belabor that point with a thousand and one ready and valid examples. Instead, just this: Shakespeare and Cicero and the pictogram-cavepainter all had far different tasks, compared to today’s scribe, in how they researched and delivered their content. They probably quite literally had skin in the game.

Skipping ahead to my personal perspective. I’ve completed a few manuscripts in a way not terribly removed from Shakespeare’s: longhand with an inkpen. After that, dozens and dozens more manuscripts banged out on a no-doubt Shakespeare’s-mind-blowing gizmo, a portable manual typewriter.

A sleek electric came next, with unbelievable bells and whistles, even a correction function that could white-out typos before your astonished eyes. That one, which Shakespeare couldn’t conceivably imagine, was a gift from good longtime pal Mark Smith.

That was my penultimate leap toward writing-Phase Next. The ultimate was and is digital word processing.

I like to think I could talk writing with Shakespeare and Cicero, maybe even Ugg. I like to think could find some kind of common ground. But try as I might, I don’t think I’d ever manage to make graspable to them any inkling of the concept, much less the impact and benefits, of digital word processing.

And in a non-unrelated development, hearty congrats to the aforementioned M.H. Smith on the publication of his first novel, Remember The Time.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Cultural Revolution continued

The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution roiled mainland China from 1966 to 1976. Inspired, perhaps even triggered, by Chairman Mao, it was a violent reaction to perceived capitalist, counter-revolutionary forces infiltrating governmental and cultural institutions.

Its costs were incalculable. Millions of people were tortured, imprisoned and killed. Untold treasures, most from the Imperial age, were looted or destroyed. Economic expansion, even agricultural self-sufficiency, was all but halted for a generation. It can be argued that it was the normalization of relations with the West (leading to contemporary China’s status as an economic superpower), that finally began to heal the Cultural Revolution’s wounds.

This history is instructive, perhaps cautionary, because China stands today on the brink of another reactionary convulsion. Only time will tell if it’s as momentous and ruinous as Mao’s great class struggle.

Its impetus is playing out, even now, in Western media as well as Chinese state television. It’s the ongoing downfall of Bo Xilai, former mayor of Chongqing and, at one time, a rising star of the communist party.

The scandal reads like cheap fiction in its tawdriness and improbability. It began to unravel on February 6, when Bo’s deputy mayor and chief of police, Wang Lijun, sought asylum at Chongqing’s U.S. consulate. As hundreds of Chinese troops began surrounding the consulate, Wang spun a tale for the incredulous Americans: breathtaking corruption, hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes, and the murder of a British citizen, Neil Heywood.

Within 24 hours the consular officials rejected Wang’s petition, citing the impossibility of spiriting him out of the country. He was turned over to the Chinese and promptly disappeared into a prison system controlled by Bo.

The damage was done, however, and the story was out. Within weeks Bo Xilai was suspended from all party and governmental positions. Shortly thereafter his wife, Gu Kailai, was arrested and formally charged with poisoning Heywood.

Chinese authorities promise full accountability, and the story thus far is attracting extraordinary coverage in the state-controlled news media. It’s this uncharacteristic openness, compounded by a widespread revulsion at the illicit wealth accumulated by Bo and his family, that might yet lead to something like a second Cultural Revolution.

The targets will likely be the so-called Red Aristocracy: party apparatchiks who have parlayed position into riches. They have taken to heart former premier Deng Xiaoping‘s era-defining slogan: “To be rich is glorious.” They prove, once and for all, that this is not their fathers’ communist party.

Consider the “princeling” Bo Guagua, son of Bo Xilai and Gu Kailai. His life of excess was legendary even before his parents’ scandal broke. His father, in better times, once attempted to deflect criticism by scornfully relaying some of the charges against him, which he called preposterous: “They say my son goes to Oxford and drives a Ferrari.” Well, no. By that time Bo Guagua had transferred from Oxford to Harvard. And he drives a Porsche.

In a nominally classless society, the privileges of the Red Aristocracy must surely rankle. The question is, how much do they rankle, and what’s to be done about it?

The original Cultural Revolution was implemented, and its worst atrocities committed, by the Red Guard, a Maoist youth movement. Today’s Chinese youth are far different; much more likely to agitate for progressive reform than for communist orthodoxy. They are more educated, more worldly, and much more interested in China’s future on the international stage.

Still, they must be as susceptible as anyone to class jealousy and to the glaring inequalities that pervades their society. And their society’s leaders must surely know this.

The Bo backlash is coming, of that there can be no doubt. Whether it comes as bloodshed or meaningful reform, remains to be seen.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

RIP Levon Helm (May 26, 1940 – April 19, 2012)

Clearly not a good week for rock-n-roll.

Today we’re bidding farewell to Levon Helm. His band was The Band. Choosing a name like that means you put the music first, and just maybe you expect to claim a place in music history. Both are true here. And Levon’s place in The Band? Drummer and vocalist; not an easy bit of multi-tasking, even if he made it look that way.

But man, that voice. I spoke to a couple people today who said they didn’t recognize the name Levon Helm. I simply played the clip below and watched the light of recognition in their eyes. Before the song was done they were agreeing that no one else sounded quite like Levon Helm, and no one ever will.

Thanks for the music, Levon. The waltz at long last is truly over, but what a waltz it was.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

RIP Dick Clark (Nov. 30, 1929 – April 18, 2012)

He’s been around so long, and has been so steeped in our media and pop culture (see: rock-and-roll, game shows, restaurants, etc.)  that it’s difficult to say what, exactly, Dick Clark’s passing means.

So for now let’s leave it at this: New Year’s Eve will never be the same. We might as well just cancel it altogether.

Thank’s Dick. You were a class act.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Long Lost Leo?

Short of a time machine, there’s just no way to authenticate some works of art. The above painting, Salvator Mundi or Savior of the World, is widely believed to have been painted by Leonardo DaVinci in the late 1490s or early 1500s. “Widely believed” is about as close as we’ll ever come to knowing for sure.

Why? It’s not just the lack of signature–signatures are in fact one of the least dependable methods of authentication (the practice of signing art began only about a century before DaVinci; forgers began copying signatures almost immediately). Salvator Mundi was unsigned, heavily overpainted, and sloppily conserved numerous times over the centuries. It languished in several museums and private collections (including that of to-be-beheaded King Charlies I of England) and was lost several times. It was only after a painstaking cleaning in 2009 that the underlying paint was revealed in its entirety. After more than a year of scholarly examination and debate, Salvator Mundi was identified, as definitively as possible, as a DaVinci original.

Another DaVinci painting, now recognized as one of his most iconic, underwent similar rediscovery in the last century. The Lady with an Ermine, a portrait of Cecilia Gallerani (mistress of the Duke of Milan), had long been described as a celebrated part of DaVinci’s catalog, and one of only four female portraits he’s known to have completed. It was “lost” sometime before 1877, and was finally rediscovered in 1945 among a Nazi hoard. Subsequent authentication took years – despite Leonardo’s name being etched in the upper-left corner. Lady with an Ermine is now almost universally accepted as DaVinci’s work, although the signature is nearly certain to have been added much later by another hand.

So it goes with art. When it comes to the most culturally significant masters, we’ll always have forged signatures and questionable provenance. But just as Salvator Mundi shows, we’ll also have occasional new additions to collections we’d assumed complete. Even if we can never be one hundred percent sure of authenticity, it’s still enough to keep the art world alive and exciting.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Books as business, or books as art?

Books are dying, if not already dead. Or they’re bigger than ever. Or maybe they’re lining Schrödinger’s litter box, because both facts seem to be simultaneously true.

Technology, including print-on-demand and electronic readers, has expanded publishing unlike anything since Guttenberg first gazed upon the wine-press and said “hmmm.” More than three million books were published in the U.S. last year, compared to less than 10% of that number barely a decade ago. Any author, wielding any manuscript, can get into print (or at least e-print) more quickly and cheaply than ever.

At the same time, overall sales of books are depressed and depressing. Last year saw a 17% decrease in print book sales, and a 6% decrease in combined print and e-book sales. The average non-fiction book sells only 250 copies per year. Meanwhile the competition for traditional shelf space is fiercer than ever, with booksellers stocking just one book for every 1,000 published. This means the average author has 0.1% chance of seeing his or her book in the stores.

Perhaps most discouraging is the the way all this represents a fight for a slice of ever-shrinking pie. The rates of reading in this country are bad – real bad – and getting worse. One-third of high-school graduates, and 40%  of college graduates, never read another book after leaving school. Seventy percent of U.S. adults haven’t stepped foot in a bookstore in the last five years. And 80% of American families (that’s all members of the family, mind you) read zero books last year.

So where does this leave us? For authors, publishers and bibliophiles (and what a tiny group we are, it seems), it leaves us adrift and at the mercy of contending currents: deep-set apathy and aggrandizing tech.

Watch-and-wait has been the most common approach. Maybe it’s the only sensible one. Maybe there’s not much else to do but to see where these trends take us, and then try our best to make a buck off them.

But that feels a little apathetic too, doesn’t it? Isn’t there some other way to take back publishing, to make it matter again?

Let’s start by treating it less like a business and more like a calling. Like art, even. Is that even possible? Before you answer, watch this video. Then see if you don’t agree, with me and with the artisans at Smith-Settle, that the book is beautiful and very much worth saving.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The best of the best of the best

This blog has purported, for fifteen long months now, to cherish, honor and when necessary deconstruct, all the culture. But let’s not kid ourselves. What this blog has really been, is a fanboy’s loveletter to his favorite actors, artists and writers, and (somewhat incongruously), celebrity chefs.

The time has come at last to crown the ultimate, to name names, to decide who’s most enriched our culture, and who has generously leveraged their talent to make our miserable lives worth living.

The following four are, simply stated, the best of the best of the best:

Best Actor: Ron Jeremy. They call him the Warthog. That’s because he has a face made for radio. Nonetheless, he’s become a giant of the screen, and not just of that narrow genre you’re thinking of. Mr. Jeremy has all but pulled out of his former style of work, and thrust himself deeply, repeatedly, into a much wider range of cinematics. Behold:

Best Artist: Thomas Kinkade.This paint-smith has brought the American ideal to modern art, by embracing an unprecedented level of branding, commercialism and a bucolic paradigm so darling that one risks an attack of diabetes by staring too long. Lesser artists might regret the mass-marketing of their work; Mr. Kinkade suppresses any such feelings by rolling around naked on piles of money.

Best Writer: Dan Brown. What other author has ever been so adept at borrowing other people’s ideas, for the sake his loyal fans? That loyalty is, never doubt, a two-way street. Mr. Brown loves his fans so much that he will not make them wait. He sates their need by bringing unto them his work as quickly as possibly, by expanding those borrowed ideas into simple, non-complicated storylines, without wasting time on structured plotting or three-dimensional characterization.

Best TV Chef: Guy Fieri. Although the airwaves are jammed with celebrity chefs, Mr. Fieri has distinguished himself by demonstrating as little culinary drudgery as possible. Instead he sets out on the lonesome highway, like in the road movies of old, if the road movies of old starred one guy only who for some reason couldn’t find a sidekick. In so doing he brings us close, intimate views of grease-choked Fryolators throughout the land. Some might argue there’s no redeeming value in such work, but from Mr. Fieri’s partnership with Friday’s Restaurants, it’s clear that someone, at least, finds it valuable indeed.

These then, have been the best of the best of the best. We hope you’ve enjoyed them. We’ll likely repeat this feature annually, checking each year to see who might challenge these Titans’ crowns. We’ll probably do so each April, somewhere near the beginning of the month. Cheers!

Posted in New Post | Tagged | Leave a comment

RIP Earl Scruggs (Jan 6, 1924 – March 28, 2012)

Maybe you don’t like bluegrass. Maybe the banjo does nothing for you. Fair enough. Even if that’s true, you must recognize when you see a maestro at work. When it came to the banjo, Earl Scruggs was that maestro.

You heard his work, his mind-blowing playing style (estimated to top 10 notes per second), way back when during the opening credits of both the Beverly Hillbillies and Bonnie and Clyde. What you heard was a game-changer, a completely new approach to playing an instrument that was invented at least a hundred years before he was born. The three-fingered picking pattern which is nearly universal among banjo players today was developed solely and independently by him, when he was barely out of his teens and working for 40 cents an hour in a North Carolina textile mill. That method has been and will forever be known as Scruggs Style.

I’ve never picked up a banjo. I’m not sure I even much like their sound. I mess about on guitar from time to time, though, and when I do I prefer to play fingerstyle. Not because I’m particularly good (or even vaguely competent) but because I think it’s fun. It’s a fun way to play.

That’s what I see when I watch Earl Scruggs play. And it makes me want to play too. It looks like it’s a blast, and this late, beloved maestro looks like he’s having the time of his life. I might yet get me a banjo, learn how to play it and have a bit of fun. But I don’t kid myself that I can ever come anywhere close to this:

Posted in New Post | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Mad for the Ad Men

Fellow Mad Men fanatics: it’s been a long 17 months, hasn’t it?

AMC is quenching our too-long thirst (with a few noontime martinis, no doubt) and returning us to that strange insular world of mid-1960s Madison Avenue. It’s insular, we’ve learned, because although its denizens will embrace whatever bit of the still-evolving Sixties that can be leveraged to SellSellSell (you’ll see what I mean when the clients from Heinz want to glom onto the college market by depicting shaggy students hoisting signs and chanting “We Want Beans!”)…it’s just as clear that the Mad Men themselves really want nothing to do with the winds of change washing over and around them. Against all reason, and against the tides of history, they’ll hold onto their fedoras, their gin-soaked workdays and their thoroughly one-sided sexual politics. If Don Draper has his way (and sorry, he won’t), it’s 1959 and holding.

What’s fascinating to me is the simultaneous glances Mad Men offers into so many relatively foreign cultures. The mid-century Manhattan chic is probably most commented upon, and probably the one exerting the most influence. It’s what nearly makes Mad Men a period costume-drama, where the sets and the wardrobes are characters in their own right, and nearly as compelling as the thunderously talented ensemble cast.

The cultural commentary that accompanies that is equally fascinating. However–and I’m only speculating here–it often seems to devolve into parody. I think back to season one, where Betty Draper is sent (somewhat against her will) to a psychiatrist. The shrink is non-committal when speaking to her, revealing almost nothing of his conclusions or diagnoses; yet, outside her presence, he gives frequent full reports to her husband.

I mean, come on. I know it was bad, but was it that bad?

Sexual politics, again, are central to the show and I suppose I can suspend disbelief. Furthermore, I wasn’t there (I was not to make my grand entrance until a bit later in the decade). If women really were second-class citizens to the Betty-Draper extent, then all we can do is salute them, Mad-Men style, with a well-worn advertising slogan: You’ve come a long way, baby.

The advertising: now that’s a part of the show I can dig into and compare with a reality I know a bit about. And I’m here to say, Mad Men is spot on.

I’ll disclose fully: I’m no Sterling-Cooper-Draper-Pryce executive. I’ve never stepped foot on Madison Avenue. My experience, at best, is that of a regional marketer, writing ad copy (to be fair, I’ve written a lot of it), both from home as a freelancer and from a desk inside an agency.

Still…Mad Men always rings true to me. The intellectual resoluteness, the borderline snideness that comes from bedazzling with words and images (bedazzling, it’s important to point out, both the clients and their customers)…and the push, always and forever, to sell the sizzle, not the steak.

The creative process, that’s what Mad Men so perfectly captures. It always (always!) starts with an absolute blank mind. It starts with carefully hidden panic. You assure the client – “Don’t worry, Stan. We got this. You’re gonna love it” – but you know you have nothing, not one good idea. And you wonder, each and every time, if this is the time you’re going to completely and permanently blow it.

Still, because you’ve been here before, you soldier on. You pound out reams of absolute crap that you can’t shred fast enough. You keep at it, trying out new ideas and turns-of-phrases, knowing they’re still no good but hoping against hope that one of them might lead, like that first tumbling domino, to something fresh, something slightly less horrible.

You’ve got one eye on the clock, of course, because the deadline is ticking ever closer.

And then–in the nick of time and exactly dramatic enough as if written for prime-time TV–that breakthrough comes. It always does. That perfect line, that perfect image, that perfect sizzle that sells so-so steaks – it always comes.

Is there something cynical about this? In Mad Men there most certainly is. In real life, or at least the life I’ve experienced, I don’t think so. In the world of marketing I’ve inhabited, our consumers have always been educated, or at least wary. They know they’re being sold to. They know their whole world is steeped in advertising. Have they revolted? Have they marched on the agency towers with pitchforks and torches?

No. They’ve handed over their dollars.

There’s an exchange of information going on; maybe not a simple one but one that’s nonetheless pretty straightforward. We, the Mad Men, seek the information that gives us leverage, that gives us our silky persuasion. And you, the consumer, may or may not allow yourself to be persuaded, but you listen nonetheless because you want to buy. Our interests might be somewhat in opposition but still we’ve found equilibrium. We call that equilibrium: capitalism.

On a much more personal note, this art and science of persuasion has done something else for me. Speaking as someone who’s been driven to write from the time I could hold a pencil, I’ve learned more about my craft, through hands-on copywriting, than any MFA course could ever offer. I’ve learned to engage the reader’s heart and mind with absolute brevity (to echo Strunk and White’s immortally succinct phrase: “Omit needless words.”). I’ve learned to fret much less over stodgy grammatical “rules” (Never end a sentence with a preposition. Really? This is a rule with which I won’t put up). And I’ve learned, as have we all, that the sizzle is the most interesting part of the steak.

These are the things that buzz like background noise around my head when Mad Men’s on. And furthest from taking away from the experience, they make me enjoy it all the more.

So join me. Pour yourself a scotch (neat, if you’ve got a shred of refinement in you), tune in, and share what you can of Don’s world. And know that in some small way, you’re sharing my world too.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Art, war, and the lost treasures of Europe

It’s staggering to realize that a conflict that ended nearly seven decades ago is still shaping so much of our lives. Politics, demographics, ethnic relations – the way we think of all these things, and many more, can be traced to the war that ravaged the world between 1939 and 1945.

The reasons for this are complex and varied. They involve the tensions among the victorious Allies, the rise (and later fall) of the Soviet Union, the realpolitik of the dismantling of empires.

The war and its aftermath have also impacted the art world, and unlike with the previous examples, the reasons were simple: Hitler fancied himself a collector. So did Goering and many other lesser princes of the Nazi party.

When Europe lay at their feet, and with untold millions of Jews, intellectuals and other “undesirables” dying in concentration camps, these fascist savants were free to help themselves to the cream of European art.

And that’s what they did, plundering vast public and private collections throughout the continent, like the conquering thugs they were.

Much of that story has been told, and told well, in extraordinary historical accounts including Lynn Nicholas’s 1995 book, The Rape of Europa.

But as is true with so many legacies of World War II, the story is ongoing. The New York Times this week reported on the mystery of a missing 1889 Monet painting, “Torrent de la Creuse,” last known to have been seized by the Gestapo in 1941. Two wealthy French clans continue to battle over this artwork, in the courtrooms and on the front pages, with the descendants of the one-time owner of the painting accusing a family of prominent art dealers of being complicit in a decades-old cover-up.

The Times story is fascinating and worth reading in its entirety. At its end, though, the mystery remains intact: where is the Monet?

In a larger vein, the same mystery holds true for many other cultural treasures. At least two Van Goghs, a Vermeer, a Klimt, a Degas – even an entire room of priceless amber panels – all have disappeared from history after being seized by the Nazis.

Some might be gone forever, trampled or burned or sunk to the bottom of the sea. Some are in museums, and might yet return to their rightful heirs, or at least countries of origin.

But some, far too many and possibly including that Monet, remain in the hands of private collectors. These collectors lie to themselves probably; they probably say the provenance is in doubt and in any case the war is long over.

They’re wrong. They perpetuate an injustice and in so doing they’re little better than the German plunderers from the ’40s. Until the Rape of Europa is redressed and all missing art is accounted for, a war crime – a crime against culture and against humanity – continues to be committed.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Ernest Hemingway: The Spanish Earth (1937)

What a cool find, and thanks as always, YouTube. This documentary provides not only one of the few surviving recordings of Hemingway’s voice (he narrated it), it also represents one of his only willing collaborations with the film industry (he co-wrote it).

Contrast that with the scads of movies made from his books and short stories: The Killers, To Have and Have Not, A Farewell to Arms and For Whom the Bell Tolls. Hemingway himself was said to be most disgusted with the Hollywood ending that Hollywood gave A Farewell to Arms. Catherine lives in that version, which kind of negates the whole “Farewell” part. He was also said to have despised the adaptation of For Whom the Bell Tolls, owing to the wholesale erasure of the book’s anti-fascist message. From a 21st century perspective the other most glaring error of that movie was the casting of Ingrid Bergman as María. Bergman was an amazing actress, but dropping a brown wig on her wasn’t enough to turn her into a Latin ingenue.

Just like Lauren Bacall was and still is amazing. Her role in To Have and Have Not (that’s the one where she tells Bogie to put his lips together and blow) is still iconic. Too bad her character, along with the setting, plot and storyline, never appeared in the book. Although Hemingway’s lead character Harry Morgan acts, talks and walks exactly like Humphrey Bogart, transforming him from a luckless Conch smuggler into pretty much a reprise of Rick Blaine destroyed any other semblance of the book.

Hemingway probably hated that too, but it didn’t stop him from cashing Hollywood’s checks. Can’t fault him for that, especially considering that so many of his contemporaries like Faulkner, Dos Passos and Mrs. Parker eventually went to write for Hollywood. That’s something Hemingway never did.

Except that once, The Spanish Earth, written not for money but in a bid to save Spain from dictatorship. Two thumbs up for effort, Papa.

Posted in New Post | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Pleiades at play

There’s this star cluster in Taurus. I can’t take my eyes off it.

Which is remarkable in two ways. The first is that there’s nothing remarkable about this star cluster. It’s up there half the year, easy to find, you probably walked under it tonight.

The second is that where I live, in a sky filled with smoke stacks and clouds of varying content, it’s often not much more than a smudge. Not nearly as nice as it looks in this picture, or as you can see it in the country, or how it undoubtedly looked hundreds of years ago.

One name for it is the Seven Sisters, which is funny because no one, not us not the Sumerians not the Native Americans and not the Hubble Space Telescope, can agree on how many stars are in there.

Seven, some say. Best I’ve counted with unaided vision was five. Through my scope I’ve seen too many to count. In many cultures, in almost every hemisphere, if you could count eleven of them you were shortlisted for a place in the King’s Archers or Royal Scouts.

Best guess is about 1000 stars, all quite young, all born together in who knows what sort of mayhem. Some of them orbit each other, very slowly, and have been lined up from our perspective, for as long as we’ve been watching. That’s why we can’t accurately count them, and probably never will.

Eighty percent of the people who started reading this decided they don’t give a rat’s ass about astronomy and have already quit reading. Eighty percent of the people still reading feel pretty much the same way, but have glanced down and are wondering what Subaru has to do with it.

Which is precisely my point. My little smudgy star cluster is, as I’ve said, above your head half the year. It’s also all around you on the freeways, and maybe in your own driveway.

That’s a good enough reason, I think, and in any case it was enough to get you to this point, rat’s ass-worth or not. It got you to the end of a piece on astronomy.

And if there was no way otherwise you’d read a piece on astronomy, so much the better. Sorry if that offends, and just try to understand: guys who have a blog and who also stare up at certain star clusters even when they can’t see them…this is kind of what we were sent here to do.

Posted in New Post | Tagged | Leave a comment