An Announcement of the Self-Important, Self-Indulgent Variety

Just a quick digression, if you don’t mind, from our usual snarky examination of modern culture…

…for the purpose of sharing new cover art for my 2009 novel, Mind.Net. This is in anticipation of the newly revised edition, to be released for multiple e-book formats ( EPUB, .mobi, .pdf, HTML, Javascript and more) later this month.

And that will be followed by the much-demanded Mind.Net sequel series, also in electronic format. (And I hasten to add, this has not just been demanded by me and my mom. Real, paying readers have been asking for denouement, for years now!)

And so, to those patient Mind.Net readers I say: thanks for your patience. Content is on the way.

And to all others: < / self indulgence!  >. Returning now to your regularly scheduled snark.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

RIP, Liz

Liz Taylor has died at age 79. She was a legendary actress, two-time Oscar winner, and probably as famous for her eight marriages as she was for her Hollywood career.

Later in life she took flack for her weight, for her relationships with younger men, for her friendship with Michael Jackson.

But let’s forget all that, and remember one very important thing about Elizabeth Taylor: she had violet eyes. Violet eyes! How is that…possible? The only explanation I’m willing to consider, in the first blush of remembering her life, is that she was simply sent here to show us what a starlet was supposed to be.

As for the specifics of her career, I’ll leave it to the more movie-savvy to write that part of her obituary. I will heartily recommend one of her lesser known roles, as the ghost of Helen of Troy (yes, really) in Doctor Faustus (1967). Very odd yet compelling movie, closely following the dialogue of the 1604 Marlowe play. But she starred opposite Sir Richard Burton, and that was always something worth seeing.

Rest in peace, Liz. There’ll never be another one like you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stand with Japan

Despite marked differences and a divisive past, the cultural connections between Japan and the West, particularly the U.S., grow stronger every year. Their love of baseball and pop music is matched only by our love of sushi and anime. It goes much deeper than that, though. There’s a mutual respect and admiration between our peoples; we celebrate each other’s triumphs, and we share in each other’s tragedies.

There have been no shortage of tragedies recently, it seems. Disaster and loss are recurring themes in every region of the world. And every victim, every survivor, deserves our sympathy and support.

But what is happening in Japan sets a new standard. Three devastating blows: an unbelievably powerful earthquake, followed by a terrifying tsunami, and then the (still evolving) nightmare of nuclear meltdown. Any one of these could destroy a nation. The combination of all three is simply unimaginable.

But of one thing I’m certain: Japan will survive this and will emerge even stronger. History and national character have proven time and again the resiliency of this remarkable culture.

Doubtlessly they could do it alone…but they won’t need to. They have earned the friendship of the world, and it is the world’s duty, and honor, to stand with Japan in her time of need.

One of the most enduring icons that Japan has bestowed upon us all is the image of the Samurai. The ideal of Bushido is an inspirational, timeless model for a life devoted to duty and honor.

So perhaps now is a good time for we friends of Japan to examine the Seven Principles of Bushido, as a timely reminder as to how one stands with one’s ally:

  1. Chu: Duty and Loyalty
  2. Gi: Justice and Morality
  3. Makoto: Deep Sincerity
  4. Rei: Polite Courtesy
  5. Jin: Selfless Compassion
  6. Yu: Heroic Courage
  7. Meiyo: Honor

Japan is not and will never be alone.

How to help:

Text to donate - The American Red Cross has once again launched a texting campaign to raise money for relief efforts in the Pacific region. Last year, the Red Cross was able to raise over $20 million for Haiti relief through simple text donations.

If you would like to donate to the American Red Cross for Japan Earthquake Relief, just text REDCROSS to 90999. Each text will provide $10 towards the Red Cross’s humanitarian efforts

Donate via Facebook - The Red Cross has also launched a campaign on Causesto raise at least $25,000 for relief efforts. By logging in to Facebook, you can donate anywhere from $10 to $500 to help Tsunami victims and their families.

As of publishing time, the Causes campaign has raised over $40,000 from over 1,000 donors and 3,000 promoters.

Donate via iTunes - Apple is also dedicating resources to the crisis in Japan. They have created a simple donation page in iTunes that makes it simple to donate anywhere from $5 to $200 to the Red Cross with just a few clicks.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Qadhafi’s Celebrity Whores

Mariah Carey. Usher. Beyoncé. Nelly Furtado. Enrique Iglesias.

These are some of the “stars” who took millions of dollars from Libya’s Muammar al-Qadhafi and his sons to perform at various private performances, including a 2008 New Year’s Eve party on the island of St. Barts.

These megabuck performances have become a fact of life, albeit a weird and somewhat shameless one, for today’s celebrities.

But there’s a stark difference between playing for some oligarch’s daughter’s sweet sixteen party, and playing for Qadhafi. The former might be mercenary, maybe a little seedy…but it’s not necessarily evil.

But playing for Qadhafi? Doing that is accepting blood money, pure and simple. Any of them who claim otherwise, or claim ignorance, are simply lying.

Of course now that they’ve been called out, a few of them are backpedaling as quick as they can. Beyoncé and Furtado have reportedly donated their Qadhafi money to charity. Expect the others to follow suit.

Is that penance enough? Not for me to say. I wouldn’t mind seeing them and their ilk boycotted, but since I’m not exactly patrons of their product I’d feel a little hollow calling for that boycott. It’d be a bit like the Selma Bus Boycott being organized by folks who never used mass transit.

But I sure don’t mind calling them out, and pointing an accusatory finger at them and every other greedy pig willing to take money from a monster like Qadhafi.

So…Usher, Mariah, all the rest: I hope it was worth it. It was a nice payday, no doubt about it, but the scale of the thing doesn’t change its nature. You’ve defined yourself by your greed, and hopefully you’ll always be remembered for what you are: Qadhafi’s whores.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Building Steam

It’s the most pervasive subculture you’ve probably never heard of, firmly established as a literary genre, a fashion aesthetic, even a musical style. It’s getting bigger every day. And its roots go much deeper than even its adherents likely know.

It’s called Steampunk, and you might think of it as an embracing of a world that never was. It idealizes the gas-lamps, the clockwork, and yes, the steam-engines of the late Victorian era…adding in a healthy dose of What if…? What if the Victorians had mastered flight (even space flight)? What if Charles Babbage’s “Differential Engine” had introduced clockwork-driven computing to the late nineteenth century? And what if any number of sci-fi or fantasy elements showed up during the early Industrial Revolution? How might that staid world of tweed, corsets and impeccable manners be impacted?

The Steampunks know. Or at least, they’ve hazarded all sorts of guesses. Attend a Steampunk convention or concert and you’ll see speculation in the form of costumes and accoutrements: silk waistcoats accented with brass rayguns, gowns and parasols offset with gears, pulleys and steam-valves. As is true with their close cultural cousins, the Cyberpunks, it seems as if dressing up is half the fun.

But unlike Cyberpunk, which was ushered in with the digital revolution, Steampunk has a venerable origin story indeed. The word itself seems to have been coined in the late eighties, by author K. W. Jeter, as an attempt to categorize the handful of authors (including himself) who were creating sci-fi and fantasy with a Victorian setting. And although it’s true that the genre was innovative for its time, it’s now generally recognized that the Steampunk pioneers were rediscovering trails rather than blazing them.

After all–what could be more Steampunk than a group of gentlemen, in the 1870s, riding a capsule fired from an immense gun, all the way to the moon? Or a Victorian inventor crafting a brasswork time machine in his parlor? That both of these scenarios spring from nineteenth-century novels by Jules Verne and H.G. Wells, respectively, gives a lengthy literary pedigree to what is now an undeniable cultural phenomenon.

Because Steampunk has moved way beyond the printed page. Verne and Wells were popular, even influential in their day. But they could have never foreseen their speculative fiction influencing music, art and design the way Steampunk is doing now.

Steampunk music, in particular, represents an aesthetic immersion. Bands like Abney Park, Voltaire and Rasputina present audiovisual spectacles, steeped in Steampunk, that extend to the design of their instruments, the construction of their stage-sets, even the narrative of their backstories. Abney Park, for example, style themselves as a crew of drunken airship pirates, fighting and plundering their way across a not-quite familiar Victorian landscape. It’s a compelling image–made all the more appealing by the fact that the music is really quite good.

Those visual elements, early industrial machinery reimagined in fantastical ways, underpin the entire Steampunk universe. Even the modern literary genre depends heavily on that descriptive aesthetic, undoubtedly because the fans demand it. And the fans adopt it themselves; not only in the aforementioned costuming but also in the pervasive practice of “modding”: modifying practically any modern object with a Steampunk appearance.

And that hands-on appeal, that invitation to bring Steampunk fully into one’s life, might just guarantee its lasting success. It is attracting the tinkerers, the artists and the writers who are investing themselves for the long haul. They’re building whole worlds around it.

And so what if it’s a world that never was? Speculation of what could have been is one of the few things that can unite literature, music and visual art. In the case of Steampunk, it is uniting them in reverence to a simpler, classier, more refined time. And many would argue that in our twisted, early twenty-first century reality, looking backwards is a hell of a lot cheerier than looking ahead.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Peanut farmer?

Just had a contentious discussion with someone who insisted that Jimmy Carter was a peanut farmer.

Jimmy Carter was not a peanut farmer. His family owned a peanut farm, and I imagine he knows a lot about peanut farming. But by profession, before politics, Jimmy Carter was a nuclear engineer and a Naval officer.

You can probably guess that the discussion was contentious not just about Carter’s credentials, but also his performance (presidentially speaking), and his legacy. I won’t rehash that here.

Except for this summary, of which I’m as certain as I can be: if he’d sent one more helicopter to Iran, he’d have been re-elected in a landslide.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Half-hearted Hollywood Hooray

And the Academy Award goes to…who cares? Not me. Awards shows utterly bore me, and the loftier the hype, the less interested I get. Can’t get much higher than Oscar hype, so no thanks, I won’t be watching. And I’ll get busy thinking of other things for the next few days, every time someone mentions the subject.

And if that sounds like anti-Hollywood snobbery…well, I plead only slightly guilty. I like movies, I truly do. There are more than a few that I completely adore. But for all that there’s that unsavory, self-congratulatory side of movie culture, the Hollywood-at-play, Hollywood-at-rest side. That’s the side I can’t or won’t abide, be it snobbery on my part or not; in any case it’s the side most obviously on display on Oscar night. So I’ll avert my gaze.

And maybe, hopefully, that gaze will fetch up toward some side of Hollywood I like more, am more comfortable abiding…

First stop has to be The David Mamet Society. He’s such a prolific screenwriter (dozens of films, including The Untouchables and Hannibal) that it’s easy to forget he’s always been first and foremost a playwright. And if he didn’t invent rapid, cutting, intelligent dialogue, then we can at least agree that he perfected it. When we’re lucky enough to receive a Mamet screenplay, adapted by Mamet from a Mamet play (a’la Glengarry Glen Ross), then we can at least glimpse upon the screen what David Mamet can do on the stage.

And a year-round favorite (which is however especially lively around August 22), is The Dorothy Parker Society. This website is an immersion in everything Parker, celebrating not just her writing but her life and times and the cultural nexus that swirled around her. Come her birthday each August, they do their level best to re-create it, flapper dresses and tuxes and all. I’m a fan of all of Mrs. Parker’s writing, but it will always be her poetry I like best. Her movie career is pretty interesting nonetheless – her credits include A Star Is Born, and she’s rumored to have tightened up the dialogue in Citizen Kane.

And thus I kind of sneak up on Hollywood, or at least its periphery. It’s how I cope with things like Oscar night. It’s a measured dose of the Hollywood I like, with not a drop of the unsavory. Suggests a certain breadth and depth to Hollywood, one that might surprise some by its existence. But yes, if you dig deep and cast wide, it yields up all sorts of appeal, no matter how snobby you fancy yourself. So hooray for Hollywood…I guess.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Big Game

On any given Sunday, they say, any team can beat any other.

But on this Sunday the best take on the best and a champion is crowned. That’s the hype anyway, and it’s the reason that American football is a religion, and Superbowl Sunday is our high holy day.

The fervor varies, of course. I know plenty of people who couldn’t care less. I know plenty more who will buy a high-def TV on Saturday (with the intention of returning it on Monday), who will paint their naked torsos green and gold (or, heaven forbid, black and yellow), who will drink themselves silly and shout themselves hoarse. Ask them why and they’ll give you the only answer that matters: “It’s the Superbowl, baby.”

And then you’ve got people like me, the middle-of-the-roaders. We like football, but we’re nobody’s idea of fanatics. We catch a few games throughout the regular season. We’re aware of the ebb and flow, the winning and losing, even if we’re not exactly steeped in it.

But come time for the Big Game, we are on. Chips and dips and brew are deployed, and eyes are glued to the screen.

I wouldn’t have it any other way, because I love this game. Doesn’t matter who’s playing. I’ll drink and chow and scream with the best of them, and if I’m not wearing the Green and Gold on my belly, trust me, I’m wearing it on my heart.

But why; that’s what I’m trying to figure out. Why does this game get its hooks in me, if only for this one glorious Sunday?

Could it be this as simple as: Hype works? I hope not. I hope I’m not that easily manipulated. But as a marketing guy I recognize the possibility. When I hear someone say they just watch the game for the commercials, I can see it certainly worked on them. And I feel smugly superior, because at least I’m not that far gone.

Because although the commercials can be amusing, and I have some level of professional interest in them, I’m there for the football, jack. I want four quarters of crunch, and if you have to cut every commercial to give it to me, then get busy cutting.

So again, why? What is happening to me? My theory is this: it’s bread and circuses. It’s the mob-fury for the games, toned down from archaic blood-lust…but only a little. The Romans used the games for crowd-control, to divert a propensity to riot into seat-bound voyeurism.

But of course that crowd was barely controlled, and the fanaticism often turned to real riot. By the same token, late Sunday evening, there’s likely to be a bit of civil unrest in Green Bay, Wisconsin or Pittsburgh PA. Windows are likely to be smashed, tear gas is likely to be used. Almost always turns out that way.

So is that, at long last, the answer? Does the Big Game rawk because it makes us almost, maybe just a little, lose control? And does that mean we like to lose control?

I can only speak for myself. And I can only accept the fact that on Sunday evening, there will be numerous incidents of me jumping to my feet, with no ability to stop myself, spilling beer and screaming at full volume, “Somebody better tackle that sumbitch!” The women of the household will look on, maybe a bit fearful, maybe with a bit of pity. And I only assure them that as long as nothing gets broke, as long as full riot doesn’t flare, as long as I maintain some whisp of control – it ain’t so bad. It’s the Superbowl, baby.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Don’t always know what we think we know

Here’s a compelling argument I heard recently, which sort of demonstrates how slippery definitions are – even definitions we think we have an handle on.

Goes something like this: What is alive? Are viruses alive? Most people would say yes. But are they? Viruses consume nothing and they leave no waste. They’re unable to reproduce on their own. They cannot survive without a host. Wouldn’t we normally consider all of those elements of the definition of life?

Now consider fire. Fire can propagate itself. It consumes, and produces waste. It takes in oxygen and expels carbon dioxide. Under those criteria, fire sounds every bit alive as your aunt Sally.

This argument by itself serves as both an interesting philosophical exercise, and a cautionary warning to NASA that maybe they ought to broaden their life-searching scope. In the broader sense it reminds us that language can be tricky, and there are fewer absolute truths than we’d like to believe.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Switching on the mic

Here we are then. After a few days of tweaking (and cussing), the Internet HQ of Cultural Deconstruction is live and primed for action.

So much to do! So much to talk about! Where to start??

Well…maybe the ideal starting point is this: Welcome. Thanks for stopping by. My name is Pat. I’m a writer. I have an unhealthy interest in politics, a debilitating jones for current events, and a jaundiced eye for all things culture. This lil’ forum is intended to help get some of that out of my system.

And you, friend, are invited along for the ride. All topics are open for discussion, all opinions are welcome. Hazing and derision are discouraged but probably inevitable.

What do you think? Are you game? Then come on in, the culture’s lukewarm.

Edited to add: one more shout-out to my good friend Ken Brown from AlyAnya & Associates, without whom this site would not exist. Thanks much, Ken. And to everyone else: need a website? Check out AlyAnya. They will make it happen.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Shout out to Amazon.com

Amazon.com has been very good to me. Some writers (and readers, and independent booksellers) have their beef with the Big Dog of book retailing. I can respect that. We can definitely discuss that.

But my humble little writing career would still be an unsubstantiated rumor if it weren’t for Amazon. I’d also own a lot fewer books. So bully for Amazon, I say.

With that, I invite you to surf on over there, check out my author’s page, and my books (here and here).

And buy a book, for pity’s sake. You can buy one of mine (I recommend it!), or you can buy someone else’s. Buy from Amazon, or buy from your local bookstore. Better still, buy from both.

But buy a book! Books are cool. All the kids are reading them. You want to be cool, don’t you?

Posted in New Post | Leave a comment